Data Field (31)
In case of a cross-NEMO trade, how should OMPs report transactions that take place in the XBID platform for the coupled intraday continuous European market? For example:
OMP_1 reports trades matched within one zone/area,
OMP_2 reports trades matched within another zone/area.
What about cross border transactions between OMP_1 and OMP_2 zones? How should the UTIs of such transactions be reported?
Answer:
An example of how to report such transactions is available in the Annex II to the TRUM: Example 2.53 – Life cycle events for orders that match in intraday market coupled.
The only difference between this guidance and Example 2.53 available in Annex II to the TRUM is that in cross-NEMO trades, OMPs receive the same UTIs from the matching platform and therefore do not need to report two UTIs as in Example 2.53, but just one as described in the example below:
TRADE LIST OMP_1:
Transaction with UTI XBID_46752 will be reported by OMP_1.
| MarketParticipant |
PRICE |
QUANTITY |
LINKODERID |
UTI |
Transaction Time |
| MarketPaticipantOMP_11 |
21 |
50 |
OMP_1-MC-O-123454 |
XBID_12345 |
2018-04-18T19:50:32.000Z |
| MarketPaticipantOMP_12 |
21 |
50 |
OMP_1-MC-O-123456 |
XBID_12345 |
2018-04-18T19:50:32.000Z |
| MarketPaticipantOMP_13 |
20 |
100 |
OMP_1-MC-O-188593 |
XBID_46752 |
2018-04-18T19:40:32.000Z |
TRADE LIST OMP_2:
Transaction with UTI XBID_46752 will be reported by OMP_2.
| MarketParticipant |
PRICE |
QUANTITY |
LINKODERID |
UTI |
Transaction Time |
| MarketParticipantOMP_21 |
19 |
30 |
OMP_2-MC-123411 |
XBID_67891 |
2018-04-18T19:47:45.000Z |
| MarketParticipantOMP_22 |
19 |
30 |
OMP_2-MC-123422 |
XBID_67891 |
2018-04-18T19:47:45.000Z |
| MarketParticipantOMP_23 |
20 |
100 |
OMP_2-MC -123433 |
XBID_46752 |
2018-04-18T19:40:32.000Z |
.
Last update: 20/07/2018
Subscribe to this Page’s RSS
