Reference to Article 7(5) of the Implementing Acts in case of Over-nomination.
Article 7(5) of the Implementing Acts stipulate that details of contracts referred to in Article 3(1)(b)(i) shall be reported as soon as possible but no later than on the working day following the availability of the allocation results. Any modification or the termination of the concluded contracts shall be reported as soon as possible but no later than on the working day following the modification or termination.
(According to Article 3(12) Regulation (EU) No 984/2013, CAM NC):
Network user nominates more than transport customer has booked. According to CAM rule this constitutes a booking of interruptible within-day capacity.
How to understand the provisions of Article 7(5) of the Implementing Acts in case of Over-nomination?
Should the cases of Over-nomination be reported?
If yes, as a new contract or as a modification of existing one?
What PROCESS_TRANSACTION.TYPE (corresponding to TRUM field 9 Transportation transaction type) shall be used in case of process not included in the Edig@s coding scheme such as:
- open Subscription Window;
- open season;
- storage allocation;
- non-ascending clock pay-as-bid auction?
The Agency, after consulting relevant parties, established procedures, standards and electronic formats based on established industry standards for reporting of information referred to in Articles 6, 8 and 9 of the Implementing Acts. The current schemas foreseen for data reporting to the Agency under REMIT are the result of extensive consultations with stakeholders during 2014 and 2015. As a result of the aforementioned consultations, the accepted values are limited to the relevant EDIGAS Code list document for valid codes.
Last update: 26/03/2016
Subscribe to this Page’s RSS